Ongoing legal support for business

We help busi­ness­es in Lviv or­gan­ise re­cur­ring legal issues: new orders, con­tract changes, claims and owners’ doc­u­ments. We agree what needs in­di­vid­ual review and what can be or­gan­ised within the working process.

When to seek help

  • Con­tracts and re­quests ac­cu­mu­late without anyone re­spon­si­ble for legal review.
  • The same terms have to be ne­go­ti­at­ed again with dif­fer­ent coun­ter­par­ties.
  • You need to or­gan­ise claims, re­spons­es and company doc­u­ments.
  • The owner needs to know which ques­tions require their de­ci­sion.

How we can help

A task queue
We agree re­cur­ring issues, pri­or­i­ties and a contact person within the busi­ness.
Working documents
We work on con­tracts, letters and company doc­u­ments within agreed in­struc­tions.
Recurring risks
Using ex­am­ples of com­plet­ed con­tracts, we iden­ti­fy tem­plates, ac­cep­tance arrange­ments and a process for re­spond­ing to claims that need or­gan­is­ing.

How we get started

  1. Describe the current process

    Explain who pre­pares doc­u­ments, ap­proves trans­ac­tions and re­ceives coun­ter­par­ties’ demands.

  2. Agree how work is handled

    For agreed tasks, we define re­spon­si­bil­i­ties, de­liv­er­ables, how ma­te­ri­als are shared, in­di­vid­u­al­ly agreed time­frames and doc­u­ment ap­proval.

  3. Agree individual instructions

    For new or unusual issues, we sep­a­rate­ly clarify the scope, timing and ma­te­ri­als needed.

What to prepare

  • Ex­am­ples of re­cur­ring con­tracts, letters and other legal re­quests.
  • A list of open issues with known dates and re­spon­si­ble people.
  • The contact person’s au­thor­i­ty and the doc­u­ment ap­proval process.

Ongoing support does not mean un­lim­it­ed tasks or con­stant avail­abil­i­ty. Lit­i­ga­tion, ac­count­ing and spe­cial­ist tax matters require a sep­a­rate agree­ment.

Define a legal instruction and approve its result

When re­quests ac­cu­mu­late, sep­a­rate the ques­tion, ex­pect­ed de­liv­er­able, missing ma­te­ri­als and de­ci­sion-maker. The ed­u­ca­tion­al in­struc­tion il­lus­trates this for a review of one agree­ment before signing.

What the instruction organises

  • A proposed task that still needs acceptance

    Use it to de­scribe a spe­cif­ic review, doc­u­ments, re­spon­si­bil­i­ties and ex­pect­ed result. A desired date does not au­to­mat­i­cal­ly become an agreed de­liv­ery dead­line.

  • Authority and specialist work remain separate

    The memo is not a power of at­tor­ney, cor­po­rate res­o­lu­tion, en­gage­ment agree­ment or opinion on signing au­thor­i­ty. Ac­count­ing, tax, lit­i­ga­tion and sector-spe­cif­ic reg­u­la­tion are not in­clud­ed au­to­mat­i­cal­ly.

Adding a ques­tion to the reg­is­ter does not mean it has been ac­cept­ed. Scope, timing, price, doc­u­ment trans­fer and further ver­sions need agree­ment.

The example and blank help define one con­tract review: what to examine, what to receive and which de­ci­sions remain open. The memo itself grants no au­thor­i­ty.

The doc­u­ment text and files are in Ukrain­ian. Ex­pla­na­tions are pro­vid­ed in the se­lect­ed site lan­guage.

Educational document context

Educational scenario

Під­при­єм­ство готує один до­го­вір до під­пи­са­н­ня та хоче ви­зна­чи­ти зав­да­н­ня, по­трі­бний ре­зуль­тат, від­по­від­аль­них і до­ку­мен­ти для пе­ре­вір­ки.

Example assumptions

  • При­клад описує під­го­тов­ку зав­да­н­ня, яке ще по­трі­бно по­го­ди­ти з ви­ко­нав­цем.
  • Вну­трі­шня бажана дата від­окрем­лю­є­ться від під­твер­дже­но­го зов­ні­шньо­го строку.
  • Кон­та­ктна особа не вва­жа­є­ться ав­то­ма­ти­чно упов­но­ва­же­ним під­пи­сан­том.

Scope of application

  • Не надає пов­но­ва­жень пред­став­ля­ти під­при­єм­ство, під­пи­су­ва­ти чи схва­лю­ва­ти пра­во­чин.
  • Не є не­о­бме­же­ним або­нент­ським об­слу­го­ву­ва­н­ням і не мі­стить обі­цян­ки до­сту­пно­сті або строку від­по­віді.
  • Не вклю­чає по­да­тко­вий чи бух­гал­тер­ський ви­сно­вок, судову справу та спе­ці­аль­не га­лу­зе­ве ре­гу­лю­ва­н­ня.

Ed­u­ca­tion­al example: the company, ma­te­ri­als and dates are fic­tion­al. This is an in­ter­nal working memo, rather than a power of at­tor­ney, cor­po­rate res­o­lu­tion or ser­vices agree­ment.

Question and deliverable
State the spe­cif­ic de­ci­sion and output. A general request to “check every­thing” does not define the in­struc­tion’s bound­aries.
Versions and gaps
List sup­plied files and missing ma­te­ri­als sep­a­rate­ly. Do not de­scribe a doc­u­ment as re­viewed when it has not been re­ceived.
Dates and acceptance status
Dis­tin­guish the desired date, ex­ter­nal dead­line and agreed de­liv­ery date. Record exactly what has already been agreed.
Contact, approval and signature
Sep­a­rate col­lect­ing ma­te­ri­als, ap­prov­ing com­mer­cial de­ci­sions and signing. Au­thor­i­ty and re­quired cor­po­rate ap­provals need their own review.
View the blank template

PDF pre­serves the layout. DOCX con­tains a tem­plate with named blanks. Check your own cir­cum­stances and at­tach­ments before use.

Checked

Separate dates, decisions and authority

If the table does not fit on the screen, scroll it hor­i­zon­tal­ly.

These checks help prevent an intended workflow from being presented as established fact.
Task entrySupporting material neededHow to record an unknown
External deadlineContract, received document or other source with its date and conditionsDeadline unverified; the source is still needed
Who approves termsIdentified role and confirmed authority for the particular decisionThe contact gathers materials; approval authority is not yet established
Version being reviewedExact file, annexes and supplied changesSome versions are missing; the final document is unidentified
Acceptance of the instructionSeparate agreement on the task, scope and termsThe task is proposed but not yet accepted

Do not turn a desired in­ter­nal date into a statu­to­ry dead­line or promised reply. If an ex­ter­nal dead­line is known, show its source at the start of the dis­cus­sion.

When a separate resource is needed

A reg­is­ter or­gan­is­es work; it does not replace as­sess­ment of each in­struc­tion’s subject.

Need a clear process for recurring work?

You can agree typical tasks, re­spon­si­bil­i­ties, doc­u­ment trans­fer and ap­proval of results. Court work, new sub­jects and ad­di­tion­al scope are dis­cussed sep­a­rate­ly.

Discuss ongoing legal support

Frequently asked questions

Must I immediately agree to ongoing support?

No. The free initial con­sul­ta­tion helps iden­ti­fy the need; you can begin with a single task.

How does support differ from reviewing one contract?

Support covers an agreed process for re­cur­ring work and pri­or­i­ties. Re­view­ing one con­tract has a spe­cif­ic doc­u­ment and de­liv­er­able.

Does one scope include every business issue?

No. Tasks, ex­clu­sions and working terms must be agreed. New in­struc­tions are not ac­cept­ed au­to­mat­i­cal­ly.

What affects the cost and preparation time?

Cost and timing depend on the number and fre­quen­cy of in­struc­tions, the con­tracts and cor­re­spon­dence in­volved, and in­ter­nal busi­ness ap­provals. New or unusual tasks change the scope; ongoing support does not mean un­lim­it­ed work or the same turn­around for every in­struc­tion.

Resources for your situation

Sources and review

Checked

Your query stays on this device