Complaint against an enforcement officer: where to file and what to include

When this is needed

This guide is for a spe­cif­ic vi­o­la­tion in en­force­ment pro­ceed­ings: an officer seized assets without a proper basis, failed to send orders or con­sid­er a request, cal­cu­lat­ed the amount in­cor­rect­ly, failed to close the pro­ceed­ing after payment, or issued an order you dispute.

In Lviv, the issue may first appear as a bank notice, a Debtors Reg­is­ter entry, an order from a private en­force­ment officer or doc­u­ments from a state en­force­ment service office. Do not tie the route au­to­mat­i­cal­ly to the nearest office: iden­ti­fy the pro­ceed­ing number, un­der­ly­ing doc­u­ment and exact action or in­ac­tion af­fect­ing your rights. If the pro­ceed­ing arose from a fine, also check whether you can chal­lenge the ad­min­is­tra­tive fine.

If the problem began with a bank account seizure, first review the guide to a seized account. It helps dis­tin­guish a request to access funds from a full com­plaint about the officer’s actions.

Applicable time limit or procedure

The rules depend on what is being en­forced. The Law on En­force­ment Pro­ceed­ings dis­tin­guish­es en­force­ment of court judg­ments from de­ci­sions of other bodies or of­fi­cials. After Law No. 4833-IX, an of­fi­cial­ly rec­og­nized con­flict arose between para­graphs 1 and 2 of Article 74 for orders im­pos­ing en­force­ment fees, a private officer’s basic re­mu­ner­a­tion, costs or fines. Do not use an old blanket in­struc­tion to file in ad­min­is­tra­tive court without check­ing ju­ris­dic­tion and the law in force on the filing date.

Do not con­flate the dead­lines. Under the Civil Pro­ce­dure Code, a com­plaint during en­force­ment of a court judg­ment is due within 10 days after the person learned or should have learned of the vi­o­la­tion; an order post­pon­ing en­force­ment actions has a 3-day period. The En­force­ment Pro­ceed­ings Law states 10 working days for de­ci­sions and actions con­cern­ing en­force­ment of a court judg­ment and 3 working days for post­pone­ment.

The head of a state en­force­ment service office also ex­er­cis­es su­per­vi­sion, but this is not a uni­ver­sal sub­sti­tute for court review. A debtor should check whether the law permits an ad­min­is­tra­tive com­plaint or re­quires a court ap­pli­ca­tion. The route for a private en­force­ment officer may also differ from a com­plaint against a state officer.

Steps to take

First collect the iden­ti­fiers: the en­force­ment pro­ceed­ing number and opening date, the officer’s name, the state en­force­ment service office or private officer status, the amount, cred­i­tor and en­force­ment doc­u­ment. If you do not have the orders, check ASVP and the Unified Reg­is­ter of Debtors and ask the officer in writing for copies.

Since 24.10.2026, a party views their ASVP ma­te­ri­als through the elec­tron­ic cabinet after elec­tron­ic iden­ti­fi­ca­tion; the former access iden­ti­fi­er is no longer used to open the ma­te­ri­als. See the guide to check­ing en­force­ment pro­ceed­ings for sig­na­ture re­quire­ments and the sign-in se­quence. Keep the pro­ceed­ing number and details of the chal­lenged doc­u­ment: the access change does not remove that need.

Next define what you are chal­leng­ing. It may be an order seizing funds, col­lect­ing an en­force­ment fee, a debt cal­cu­la­tion, refusal to lift a seizure, in­ac­tion after your request or another spe­cif­ic act. If the issue is the state en­force­ment fee, first conduct a doc­u­ment review of the order, rather than as­sum­ing the court and dead­line.

Then choose a route using the law in force on the filing date and current case law. If a civil court judg­ment is being en­forced, check the pro­ce­dur­al rules for that court. For orders about fees, re­mu­ner­a­tion, costs or fines, do not rely on the old ap­proach because of the Article 74 con­flict. If you are a cred­i­tor chal­leng­ing a state officer, sep­a­rate­ly check the limits of su­per­vi­sion by the head of the state en­force­ment office.

What to check before filing

Check the date from which the dead­line runs. It may be the day you re­ceived an order, a bank notice or the officer’s reply, gained access to the case file, or the day the in­ac­tion became clear. Without ev­i­dence of that date, it is harder for the court or au­thor­i­ty to assess whether the com­plaint is timely.

Check whether you need to chal­lenge the un­der­ly­ing doc­u­ment rather than the officer. If pro­ceed­ings were opened under a court order, con­sid­er can­celling the court order. If the basis is a no­tar­i­al en­force­ment writ, a sep­a­rate claim con­cern­ing the en­force­ment writ is needed. A com­plaint against the officer will not au­to­mat­i­cal­ly remove the debt.

Also for­mu­late the relief you seek. De­pend­ing on the case, ask to set aside an order, declare an action un­law­ful, require the officer to con­sid­er a request, correct an error, remedy a vi­o­la­tion or take a spe­cif­ic action. A vague request to “look into it” is usually weak.

When to consult a lawyer

A lawyer is useful if the dead­line is close, ac­counts are seized, money is being debited, several pro­ceed­ings exist or it is unclear what is being en­forced. A wrong route can cost time while col­lec­tion con­tin­ues.

For cases in Lviv and Lviv region, advice is useful when you need to quickly choose between a court, an ad­min­is­tra­tive court, the head of the state en­force­ment office, or a par­al­lel chal­lenge to a court order, en­force­ment writ or other doc­u­ment. We can review the orders, dead­lines and ev­i­dence, then prepare a com­plaint or another pro­ce­dur­al doc­u­ment without un­nec­es­sary rounds of re­fer­ral.